The Health Protection

THE protection of the affection and health at a point are similar. Nobody knows what they are worth until after they lose. Manuel Machado. A right the basic SOCIAL right to health protection is a basic social right recognised by our Constitution, and it is a priority because it is part of the social and democratic State of law. In the welfare state the guiding principles mark the thread of the action of the public authorities so that there is a minimum of coherence between the objective to achieve and the results obtained. The effectiveness of this right to protection of health is not achieved with the inhibition of the public authorities, but it requires an acting trustee in two well-defined fronts. One, through the development of measures and preventive actions that prevent disease, that fight against the deterioration of health and to maintain the quality of life of citizens.

Another focused on a directly lending performance of services, through the Organization of the necessary resources, so that arises when the disease can and need to be combated with all means available and ideal Sciences. However, the welfare state comes suffering from long ago not a few offensives. Social gains achieved in the second half of the 20th century in the Western world, are beginning to be questioned by neo-Liberals, who argue that the overhead of the State is responsible for the economic crisis that in recent years many countries have suffered more or less profound form. But a society without economic rights and social rights, governed exclusively by the principle of free competition, will be driven back to a society with huge differences and antagonisms of class that would explode by itself sooner or later. The General Law of health to establish the principle of universalization of benefits provided a legal framework to the demands of the population, but also blamed the national health system serving all citizens in their needs and rights without meaning. Currently, there are proposals extremely dangerous that represent the failure of the principle of the national system of health as a universal insurer. These proposals, based on freedom of choice among insurance companies, do not take into consideration the costs of solidarity and, in addition, introduce incentives for risk selection.

The alleged freedom of choice of the citizen or consumer would end up in free choice of private companies that would, finally, which would elect to its customers. These proposals promise immediate for a majority of the population improvement, but hide negative future effects. In health do not work the schemas of the free market. The free market in health insurance creates situations of great injustice and in addition there are examples of how the resources are used badly, useless consumption increases and citizens wary and flock en masse to complain to the justice. And is that, as the poet said: Finally and after do not have / in where falling down dead. / Why, in the end, you should not fall / and, after all, are still living. Francisco Arias Solis investigate the crimes of the Franco regime is not a crime. By a judiciary worthy. Internet for peace and freedom and free forum.

0 Responses to “The Health Protection”


Comments are currently closed.