Dan Ariely

We teach our young to dominate the universe exterior, but we do not teach them to dominate its world interior. The man became a stranger for he himself. The young does not know its limits; they had not learned to ask for pardon; they had not learned if to place in the place of the other. We do not teach them to contemplate the beauty, to think before acting, to perceive that its right finishes where the right of the other starts; we do not teach them to deal with the inevitable failures nor humildade to recognize its errors. We transmit knowledge, but we do not teach wisdom. Chapter 2. Facing the requirements of the modern life the evolution did not prepare in them to live in the modern society that we construct. Dan Ariely Had, Israeli psychologist Says the philosophy that the man is perpetual ' ' to come-the-ser' '.

This because it is always searching progressos, desiring one something more and planning for itself great conquests. as it could not be different, is always on this side of what it desires. Science was extended very nowadays, however it did not raise the standard of living human being, it did not produce mature and experienced men. A person can withholds much scientific knowledge, to have academic headings, but, still thus, she could be infantile, immature in its experience of life, not knowing to support nor to grow ahead of its frustrations. The human being is a type of being in which the symbolic one defines the organic condition of its functioning, a time that the matureness comes to occur the birth after, molded in function of the cerebral neuroplasticidade. The thesis to assume that to the psychic alterations they analogous correspond to the alterations biochemists verificvel in some measure. However, to place the causalidade of the side of the biochemist is to controvert what the evolution of the species human being came to demonstrate.

0 Responses to “Dan Ariely”


Comments are currently closed.